St Bernard Newfoundland Cross Problems

Ni-Ni "what? I have warm

Today I decided it was up to the eggs. Not until the bow, not fed up. Not until the eggs.

nearly a year working for free, and the rest of my life working for wages of shit (well, except in Ireland monitors, that was a salary and other nonsense). I have 25 years and I keep costing my parents. And, worst of all is that when I hear my friend Josefine (German) to say he does not know whether to stay or go home Elei, where no work, or my friend Melissa (Mexican), claim the same, I know not only is there no work home, is that there is little chance that there is short term. Come on, I'm here and I could eat the mucus in Madrid.

I'm up to the bow. Seriously. I'm tired of working for love of art, for making me a resume, and gain experience. Since I have experience, my resume is fat like him only and my love of art means that I get home and write instead of doing anything else. My love of art does not mean go for coffee, make photocopies or create databases that others consider it a roll to do, although they get paid. What do you do with this anger? Do you stop working?

Protest.

Toma will eat the Ni-Ni and potatoes.

Black White Damask Card Stock

Come with Hot Coffee, I have to remove the system and if not explode.

Let's see, raise your hand all those who believe this, the Estates, the country is meaningless demands. Okay, now raise your hand if you have ever heard the story of the demand of hot coffee in the car. Yeah, man, legend has it that a woman bought a coffee, got into the car, placed it between the legs, it fell, burned and sued the company, earning hard everywhere. Sure some have heard.

All you have heard is a lie. One of the best public relations campaigns in recent years. Flip.

Lady of 80 years goes to McDonalds (who else) with his grandson, who is leading. The lady is passing, so we understand. Shop the Drive Through, which means from the car (one of these American customs that ... I will not judge, I will not judge) and ask for coffee of yore. The grandson also asks milk and sugar, because he knows the most and knows she making coffee that way. Take coffee, hands it to her grandmother and park, I repeat, park so that your grandmother can, quietly, add the seasonings. The grandmother put the coffee between my legs because, oddly enough in this country who have cars equipped for everything, the car sits her grandson does not have glasses. Open the lid. And flop, you drop the coffee in the legs. The lady started to scream.

coffee as McDonalds manuals, is 180-190 degrees Fahrenheit. I have become, are between 82 and 88 Celsius. An egg, come on. On the legs of an old woman. The film shows images of the burns, and are not at all pleasant. Come see me that in my grandfather or my grandmother and sets fire to the burger. Because yes, it's coffee, is hot. But it was third degree burns on his thigh. ¿What the hell does that to your esophagus if instead of tirártelo above what you swallow?? The lady and the family of the lady, tell McDonalds that 1) check your code and the temperature at which it must be the coffee because that is not normal, and 2) McDonalds tells you to pay medical expenses the elderly, totaling $ 10,000. McDonalds says it gives 800. Man, good. At the end of trial, of course. Olé for the world.

The jury (which is a party Justice of the pride that most Americans) decides that, after hearing testimony (including that of a boss of McDonalds, which reads that "Poor than swallow the coffee directly ") and see evidence that happy because of the coffee, McDonald's had accumulated more than 700 complaints (yes, seven hundred), indemnify the lady with $ 2.7 million in punitive damages. Plate. MacDonalds begins to tremble. Because (I learned a lot from this documentary right) punitive damages, as opposed to compensatory, come to serve as a lesson to the defendant to change its attitude (lease, to stop serving coffee that escaldaría a cat in seconds). The judge lowered the amount to 400,000 (that part I lost a little) but, before the ladies and their families appealed, apparently reached a secret agreement and that was that.

What is to study the marketing piece that brought the large corporations in the U.S. (and by extension the world) against the woman and began what is called "frivolous lawsuits." It was suggested that this was a crazy country, they all wanted money and all you had to protect companies from cranks who claim meaningless. Hence the Tort Reform (I have no no idea how to translate "tort" in English and, unless my good friend Paula read this and tell me if such thing exists in our laws, I doubt it so let me explain, I will continue without know.) The torts are exercised damage on a person because of negligence (or so) in civil suits (sorry the explanation is that the laws it is a mess). The Tort Reform, sponsored by large corporations, claroquesí, seeks to place limits on such claims, arguing that many of the objections raised in this country have no purpose and will cost lots of money to the state. The Tort Reform has not yet been approved.

From Tort Reform to pass Damages Caps, which is to say that put limits on the amount the plaintiff can win damages. And nationally the Tort Reform came face to face with many people, these Damages Caps have been approved in some states (Texas, expensive yes, minidot to know who was the Governor of those) and often refer to damage not economic. That is, if there is medical negligence, for example, you're deaf, the damage has occurred to leave you deaf, it is difficult to measure, is a non-economic damage and its "cost" is very subjective. Depends, as I tell you, the jury. Oh, the jury. Sure, they are proud of their juries but what use the jury if there is a cap that once the jury overflow, the judge will be applied? There went half constitution, according to critics of Tort Reform .

Here I am eating half documentary but let the final, since they are not sufficient to Damages Caps have been drawn worse sleeve: binding arbitration. As companies are being made with the piece demands poop them fall from time to time, more so than even many of saints They deserve it, because they have invented a thing called the "compulsory arbitration", including contracts galore. Contracts not only work but also on mobile, credit cards ... The happy arbitration is a clause, that no one, including me, learns that the sign says you agree to submit yourself to binding arbitration in case there is a problem in the company and give up your right to sue. Plate. The Constitution they spend there. If loads of contracts now have such clause, and a lot of people are unemployed, what do you think makes the most?

best and are the details arbitration. Ponte I sign it and behind T-Mobile sued. We go to arbitration where the arbitrator (judge) is 1) chosen by the company, 2) paid by the company and 3) free to explain why the decision in favor of those who take it. To put the icing on the cake, arbitration and resolution are secret. Ahem ... who believe that support most of these agreements? Minidot for believing that the judge wants to return to work and you're not going to put demands every day, but T-Mobile as it does have to defend several times a month.

And now, the example that makes the documentary, the case of Jamie Leigh Jones against Halliburton. Jamie worked for this company in Texas. After a year there, she was sent to Iraq, in theory, housed in a barracks with women. When you get there and ran into a herd of guys who lived in the same place where she was supposed to live, called his company and asked for compliance with the conditions that had been promised. Halliburton said "You'll get used ." Three days later he was drugged and raped by several of his colleagues. I save the details of those days, which are well explained in the film. The fact is that when Jamie decided to sue, he realized that he could not, that his contract the work sent directly to binding arbitration. With the help of a senator who championed their cause, and after much hard work, the latest I have is that you have been granted their day in court so you can take them to court as they deserve.

So come on, so is the calico here and there and everywhere. If Obama, which I trust blindly, he bumped with corporate America, with a system that has impeded progress in many of the things I wanted to change ... where do we go with the politicians who have given us? How mob as Mariano Rajoy, which shows a total disrespect to those who complain how is the situation and say we can not throw us out over politics? How mob as our president, the best thing he did was to approve gay marriage and half a lifetime ago and since then has returned to give foot with ball? With a mayor who is stealing and who continue to vote people of all ages and conditions?

How is the court, I think I'll just take the arm of Sunrise Number 1 and also go into space to see if ET makes me a little hole in his world.

Ontario Temporary License

"I am more than tired and do not want to continue supporting it"
- Network, an unforgiving world - You can

to thank you reading my self calm. Do they have 8 hours of work, traffic, shopping, a roommate and an independent film unbearable adorable (plus a dose of Ted, and Barney), which cleared to the recent anger. And do not think, that lasted from Friday afternoon until Monday morning, 6.15, when I picked up my friend Sara to go to yoga and the first thing I came out was "I am outraged ."

And you will ask yourselves ... What did the girl who loves to brighten the day he got angry much? For injustice. Lies. Lack information. All mixed together Hot Coffee, a documentary that was presented at Sundance this year and is worthy of putting the willies world, in particular, to any average American. Do not worry, it is an extensive article on the documentary soon. But the funny thing was that the anger of the documentary spread.

pisses me off with carnivores as I believe we are smarter than others, when I continue with this Chinese study on nutrition (the book has emerged as the Bible, and read about biology before bedtime gives to some) which means that, at least, I asked myself: What if we're wrong? pisses me off with my mates high school who did not want to sponsor a child from the class because "many NGOs steal." You have to j. .. I bristle with large corporations that handle siding with those who are indignant because helmets are re-standing for election as an excuse that he was brandishing the PP (I did not vote in this election, that I missed the deadline and still no car and homeless) without being aware of what has made the region or what to do. Pisses me off to Madrid to continue mourning the absence of Pepe happy, and I bristle with conspiracy not believe that Bin Laden is dead because, of course, would be nice to stop thinking that the world is so rotten, even if one day . Then I pissed by pissed off because, seeing the calico, why not go to distrust. But the anger

maximum, leading to heat up in my Facebook every week, came to think that many, many people still do not know what conditions are causing the information they get from election campaigns.

I'm not a journalist but as if it were. I have no career, nor knowledge, nor probably a quarter of the talent of a true journalist. But I sucked. My parents are journalists, most of his friends, half of my Facebook what is in one way or another, and my life has been governed by the timing of New Spain and, depending on the season, RNE and TVE. I grew up newsrooms Newspaper, radio studios and an office on television (one already was old enough to stay home from work with dad). And I know what the vocation, because I've seen in my house. For my parents, and good people are good journalists. I say this with pride leaking through the pores. They are good for nonconformists, critics, because they argue, because they think ... They are good because they are angry. But do not believe there is life beyond them. Thanks to my parents I have met wonderful media professionals in many media. As Anna Grau as Jose Antonio Guardiola as Aitana Castaño . People, moving in the environment that is, the above questions, ask, is interested in the truth. Good journalists. Good journalists

wasted on an election campaign. Because if you do not know, the coverage of these weeks is laughable. And not their fault. Let's see, it plays a Madrid-Barça, Mou is not going to the press and mounted the octopus. But calls for a counselor, a councilman, a mayor, a politician, that is, a press conference on the banning, I repeat, prohibits the questions ... and this one screams, rather than professionals to seam them the right to perform the job, to report. So we are, with journalists and many others allow it to throw his hands to his head and decide mobilized. Here: No questions no coverage.

second part of the soap opera: the happy screen quota. Previously, public television, with good intention, I suppose, to accommodate everyone in their reporting, required space for all political parties in proportion to their representation in government. That is, the PSOE would have X minutes, the PP, to this day, a bit less than the other X, IU less .... And so on. The screen quota, which remains in the news, has a good background (I hope that the idea was not to marginalize any) but not so good result because, if I want to give an IU news today, it also forces me to spend time PP and PSOE relevance when, perhaps, by some marvel of fate, today is not news. That the service. Previously added at the beginning because now, with the Electoral Reform Act, decisions must be taken so great also private. It must be that they do not trust the journalist you have to do your work and decide what is news carallo and what is chaff.

But my favorite are the canned reports. That is, the political party in turn gives a rally ... and do not let the journalists, but that they record, edit and deliver the information readily. But we will see, hear, I was not the reporter, who decided what is worth and what is not counted. Ah, that's going to be no.

occasion of such infamy, on RTVE's Information Council, which my father is part (I add the note because I think I will get linked directly to your Facebook, and do not know if you see if you are not their friends, but good) has expressed their opposition to any of the above information I have given on the voter information. When you see the election of TVE pseudoinformation a sign that says PICTURE MADE ... (PP, PSOE, etc), means that these parties do not let TVE use their own means and force them to use their images. Journalists are being mobilized. FAPE (Federation Association of Journalists of Spain) joins .

But let me remind you something. Those are the professionals. Those fighting for their work, to exercise it in a dignified manner, by kill the essence of the Fourth Estate.

What about us? Do not journalists? Those who consume the information that is presented as what is not? Are we on the other hand, those who voted, those who disagree? How much are we all willing to fight to keep these, the good up there, protesting, fighting, fighting for, we are not sure, tell the truth? Read

a moaner father here, and if you want, tweeter here. And fight for their rights, that continue to be ours.